[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: sysvinit VS initng VS upstart VS launchd (Was: Future New Init for FC7?)
- From: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: sysvinit VS initng VS upstart VS launchd (Was: Future New Init for FC7?)
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:01:38 +0200
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>
> LSB had just finished standardizing the init scripts and now we're
> going to break things again. Users *are* going to complain.
> Analysts *are* going to say Linux is fragmented. Microsoft *is*
> going to publish studies saying that Linux has higher TCO because
> of multiple init systems ;-)
>
> This doesn't mean there should be a single codebase. Multiple
> systems could compete as long as they are 100% (or maybe just 99%)
> compatible config files and user interface.
All the init systems should be parallel installable, so the choice is
only for the default init system.
--
Pat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]