Re: Standard naming scheme for KDE components?

[Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi>]

On Saturday 28 April 2007, Jonathan Underwood wrote:

> Where a package is only built for GNU Emacs, the main package name is
> emacs-foo (see eg. emacs-auctex or emacs-vm). Presumable, if a package
> was only meant for XEmacs, it would be called xmeacs-foo. I don't
> think there are any of the latter packages.

We have at least xemacs-packages-base and xemacs-packages-extra.