Re: no restriction license?

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:16 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:54:05AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> > 
> > Is that the only license for Lesstif?
> 
> No, there are LGPLv2+, MIT and GPLv2+ parts.
> 
> > Strictly speaking, this isn't a license. This is copyright assignment
> > with no restrictions.
> > 
> > I haven't added it to the table yet, because so far, nothing has been
> > wholly under this "license". It's not worth listing until we hit a case
> > where this is the only "license" for a package.
> 
> I thought than when there are multiple licenses all must be listed with
> and:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-5dcaa7704b32aabaddc2e709f328f48eea6c91de

Yes. Except for this. You don't have to list "no license". ;)

~spot