[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: boost-1.34.1 building multiple library variants
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: boost-1.34.1 building multiple library variants
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:00:15 -0500
This is now BZ 250802.
> It appears that the boost-1.34.1 package is building multiple library
> variants; specifically, both thread-safe and non-thread-safe versions
> of each library get built and installed.
Yes. This matches upstream behavior.
There has been some discussion of this upstream issue (see boost-build
in January, others), but no resolution.
> This is a departure from the boost 1.33.1 package, where only the
> thread-safe variants of the libraries were built and installed.
Yes.
> Is this change deliberate? Do we really need the non-thread-safe
> variants?
This change is deliberate. The way boost is currently structured, both
are needed.
> This change has some unfortunate consequences. First of all, since
> there is no non-thread-safe variant of libboost_thread, there is no
> more libboost_thread.so. So someone trying to link with that library
> (which existed in the boost 1.33.1 package) will fail. But this isn't
> the worst of it. Someone linking with, for instance, -lboost_regex
> will now get a variant of the library that *is not*
> thread-safe--where with boost-1.33.1 the same -l flag links to a
> library that *is* thread-safe.
boost users expecting thread safe libraries now have to use the -mt.*
versions.
-benjamin
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]