[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: licence tag questions
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: licence tag questions
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:21:01 -0400
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:11:21AM +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote:
> I'm updating the License tag in the spec file of my packages.
>
> Checking the source files of 'recode' I found the following licenses:
> mostly GPLv2+, LGPLv2+, and in some files GNU Library General Public
> License.
> According to gnu.org the GNU Library General Public License has been
> succeeded by the GNU Lesser General Public License.
>
> What should I use in the License tag??
GNU Lesser General Public License is a name of the license that was
introduced for LGPL2.1, before that (e.g. LGPL2) it was called
GNU Library General Public License. I think in License: we aren't supposed
to differentiate between LGPL2 and LGPL2.1, so both licenses
are to be tagged with LGPLv2 resp. LGPLv2+, depending on if they allow
any later version or not.
Jakub
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]