Re: gifsicle license question

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 23:32 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Looks a lot like MIT to me.  So "GPLv2+ and MIT"?
> > 
> 
> It is MIT (new style), but unless that c file gets build into a binary
> all by 
> itself, the resulting binaries are all GPLv2+ (as thats the more
> restrective 
> license of their input files. And this the license tag is simple:
> License: GPLv2+


This is correct. :)

~spot