gifsicle license question
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Aug 22 14:59:31 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 23:32 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Looks a lot like MIT to me. So "GPLv2+ and MIT"?
> >
>
> It is MIT (new style), but unless that c file gets build into a binary
> all by
> itself, the resulting binaries are all GPLv2+ (as thats the more
> restrective
> license of their input files. And this the license tag is simple:
> License: GPLv2+
This is correct. :)
~spot
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list