Re: Spin license

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:52 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Even if the Spin Public License is acceptable  I don't think we could
> include the available codebase as is. What we really really need, is
> an upstream release that is already self-consistently licensed with
> the spin public license. The tarball I found was not.

Yes. First, we need this, then we'll review the license used.

Note that the following will prevent it a license from being OK for
Fedora:

* Use restrictions
* Commercial restrictions
* Modification restrictions

~spot