Re: Spin license

["Jerry James" <loganjerry gmail com>]

On 8/22/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa redhat com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:52 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > Even if the Spin Public License is acceptable  I don't think we could
> > include the available codebase as is. What we really really need, is
> > an upstream release that is already self-consistently licensed with
> > the spin public license. The tarball I found was not.
>
> Yes. First, we need this, then we'll review the license used.
>
> Note that the following will prevent it a license from being OK for
> Fedora:
>
> * Use restrictions
> * Commercial restrictions
> * Modification restrictions

Thanks for the information.  I'll talk to upstream and see what can be done.
-- 
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/