[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Problems upgrading to util-linux-ng in today's rawhide
- From: Orion Poplawski <orion cora nwra com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Problems upgrading to util-linux-ng in today's rawhide
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:07:27 -0600
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/i386 from install of util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8
conflicts with file from package setarch-2.0-4.fc7
file /usr/bin/linux32 from install of util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8
conflicts with file from package setarch-2.0-4.fc7
file /usr/bin/linux64 from install of util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8
conflicts with file from package setarch-2.0-4.fc7
file /usr/bin/setarch from install of util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8
conflicts with file from package setarch-2.0-4.fc7
file /usr/share/man/man8/setarch.8.gz from install of
util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8 conflicts with file from package
setarch-2.0-4.fc7
# rpm -q --obsoletes -p
/data/sw1/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora/util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8.i386.rpm
mount <= 2.11
losetup <= 2.11
schedutils <= 1.5
util-linux <= 2.13.0.51
setarch <= 2.0-4
# rpm -q setarch
setarch-2.0-4.fc7
Fails because setarch-2.0-4.fc7 > setarch-2.0-4 ? Should it just be
"Obsoletes: setarch <= 2.0"? Looks like it's fixed with "Obsoletes:
setarch <= 2.0-99", but I'm curious if the former would work. Seems
best to avoid the release tag if possible.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion cora nwra com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]