[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: is "ps" broken in rawhide?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip kanarip com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Could someone who has rawhide tip installed check the behavior of
>>> "ps p $$" ?
> 
>> [kanarip elwood revisor]$ ps p $$
>>   PID TTY      STAT   TIME COMMAND
>>  4637 pts/3    Ss     0:01 bash
> 
>> I'm not sure if this shows you what you need.
> 
> Well, it sure looks like the expected output, so now I have no
> theory as to why the build failed :-(.  Thanks for checking.
> 
> Red Hat's internal build systems have a process whereby a developer can
> get manual access to a failed build's chroot and poke around to discover
> the problem.  Is there any equivalent arrangement for Fedora builds?
> 

I'm not sure we have, I've never tried nor heard/read anyone talk/chat
about it.

- --
Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
- -kanarip

- --
http://www.kanarip.com/
RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA
C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258  F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG0LddKN6f2pNCvwgRAjBtAKCCpXJ4B9gDm8bWUF6d4OVUi1hfngCgqo2C
zg9lK787Up3V/L5LfSsgn7w=
=gs7n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]