[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Heads up, slight tree path change
- From: Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip kanarip com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Heads up, slight tree path change
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:12:53 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:30:41 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org> wrote:
>
>> Of course but derivative distributions and even respins would want is
>> the ability to point to Fedora for the source and I think we can
>> accommodate that requirement without any additional liability.
>
> I don't think we can, as we'd have to start distributing under 3b, for
> every single binary we ship. That's going to piss off a lot of mirrors
> if they have to carry all copies of the source of every update we've
> ever released for (at least) three years.
>
Do they have to be in the same tree on all mirrors, or can the master
download server (say http://download.fedora.redhat.com) have a larger
tree then the master server the mirrors sync from?
- --
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
- -kanarip
- --
http://www.kanarip.com/
RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA
C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258 F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG1tBlKN6f2pNCvwgRAigQAKCT4lr+wbSaOcT6ppC78Mx5WwbsUwCeM/vK
nourPxinHt9Hx+rhByn6HQA=
=D9uX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]