Re: Proposed changes to buildsys-build group (otherwise known as the Exceptions list)

[Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>]

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:22:06AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> 
> > So we now have to buildrequire even the packages from the third list
> > above? Such as binutils, glibc-devel, glibc-headers and kernel-headers?
> 
> I seem to recall that kernel-headers should never be needed explicitely. 
Well, that's what I consider to be a packaging bug.

IMO, kernel-headers should never be needed unless explicitly required
(or being pulled-in indirectly).

Ralf