Guidelines for creating subpackages?
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Sat Dec 1 17:13:55 UTC 2007
Christopher Stone wrote:
> This is an *extremely* important topic.
>
> Let's face it, if Fedora wants to have any hope of becoming a base
> distribution for all other distributions, then all optional requires
> will need to be split into sub-packages.
>
> We must have as fine a granularity in our packages as possible.
When/if it makes sense, and doesn't create an unduly increased maintainance
burden, sure.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list