yum, x86_64 and i386: the never ending story

Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 03:43:38 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 02:12 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 12/12/2007, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 7:51 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > > To me this looks like xfprint.i386 and Thunar.i386 are installed by
> > > > accident and then pull in the all the rest. Can anybody explain this to
> > > > me?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that this behavior is desired by 99 % of the users.
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure that that statistic is made up.
> >
> > 88.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
> >
> 
> So it's all spot's fault.

Blame, blame, blame. You can't prove anything.

~spot




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list