libflashsupport - Shouldn't this be libflashsupport-pulse or something like that?

Kelly Miller lightsolphoenix at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 00:41:47 UTC 2007


It just seems to me that there is a good chance for conflict if there is 
another plugin for Flash sound ever added to the repository; 
technically, any sound extension is providing libflashsupport...

Wouldn't it be better to call the package libflashsupport-pulse and have 
it "Provides: libflashsupport" or something along those lines?




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list