libflashsupport - Shouldn't this be libflashsupport-pulse or something like that?
Kelly Miller
lightsolphoenix at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 00:41:47 UTC 2007
It just seems to me that there is a good chance for conflict if there is
another plugin for Flash sound ever added to the repository;
technically, any sound extension is providing libflashsupport...
Wouldn't it be better to call the package libflashsupport-pulse and have
it "Provides: libflashsupport" or something along those lines?
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list