Re: FC7T1 and Bugzilla product / version

[nodata <lsof nodata co uk>]

Am Samstag, den 03.02.2007, 17:52 -0500 schrieb Michel Salim:
> 2007/2/3, Will Woods <wwoods redhat com>:
> > On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Jesse Keating (jkeating redhat com) said:
> > > > I don't.  More interestingly, is there value in having a test1 version instead
> > > > of just defaulting to devel during the development process?  We wind up with
> > > > a ton of bugs in both anyway, why double our search efforts?  What compelling
> > > > reasons do we have for pooping out new versions to file bugs against for each
> > > > test release, when we most likely want each bug reporter to update to latest
> > > > rawhide and try it again?
> > >
> > > Requires manually shuffling the bugs to the final release later.
> > > Other than that, no real issues.
> >
> > Yeah, it makes sense to me. I guess the weird part will be figuring out
> > which of the 'devel' bugs are actually against F7 and which are from
> > older releases.
> >
> How about filing bugs against 'devel' but adding a 'f7test1' keyword to it?
> 

Why not add a "current stable" version, with a distro keyword for it?