[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Default MTA for Fedora 7



Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 15:48, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
> > Precisely. So let's make sure that whatever is put on the media, is
> > something that we can somehow justify as our default packages for
> > whatever. I don't care about which mailer is chosen as default, but I'm
> > not too fond of the: "package XXX is the default choice for function
> > YYY, because it won the *sort* contest". If we are going to include an
> > MTA on the media at all - and install should of course be possible
> > without network connectivity - we should be in charge of which mailer
> > goes there. It should not be left to chance.

> I really really don't want to make that decision, because no matter _what_ 
> decision I make, people with pitchforks are going to come after me.  So I'm 
> perfectly happy to make _no_ decision and let the tool sort it out.

That by itself /is/ a decision...

Yes, I know about the pitchforks and all, and can't say I envy your
position. But MTA is just one of the areas where there are several
alternatives (vi vs emacs vs Xemacs, bash vs ash vs dash vs zsh vs ...) 
plus the many "Do we include ...?" Better set up an uniform way to decide
such questions, just leaving them to "random" doesn't cut it.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  +56 32 2797513


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]