Smolt: firsboot revisited

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:43 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 03:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 02:19 +0000, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > > > On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 02:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I don't think you've ever said how the information is being sent
> > > > without user permission or what the personal data is that is being
> > > > sent.
> > 
> > > The smolt developers would be the ones to reply this. 
> > The smolt developers and the smolt code HAS replied to this.
> 
> Yes, but this thread started with "Shall smolt be installed by default",
> so the question wasn't "opt-in/opt-out", it was "installed by default"

just b/c something is installed by default means nothing about whether
or not you have to run it and nothing further on whether or not you have
to agree to do anything if it does run.

-sv