[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Smolt: firsboot revisited



On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 03:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 02:19 +0000, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > > On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 02:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think you've ever said how the information is being sent
> > > without user permission or what the personal data is that is being
> > > sent.
>
> > The smolt developers would be the ones to reply this.
> The smolt developers and the smolt code HAS replied to this.

Yes, but this thread started with "Shall smolt be installed by default",
so the question wasn't "opt-in/opt-out", it was "installed by default"

I expressed my opinion and said: No, ...

Arthur's was "how" - I said "http:" and "what"

Ralf

I think "installed by default" here means that the Smolt code will be
on the install media and copied to the hard drive by default (if even
that much) - installing sends no data - the user has to choose to run
it. hence the "opt-in" . The discussion on opt-in/out ended long ago.

--
Fedora Core 6 and proud


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]