[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20070220 changes
- From: Adam Jackson <ajackson redhat com>
- To: gilboad gmail com, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20070220 changes
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:47:10 -0500
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:09 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:44 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:24 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:22 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 05:51 -0500, buildsys redhat com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Updated Packages:
> > > >
> > > > > libdrm-2.3.0-4.fc7
> > > > > ------------------
> > > > > * Mon Feb 19 2007 Adam Jackson <ajax redhat com> 2.3.0-4
> > > > > - Update nouveau patch
> > > > > - Fix License tag and other rpmlint noise
> > > >
> > > > OT question (that might not be related...)
> > > > Any idea when the latest DRI drivers (especially, mach64 and nv) will
> > > > imported into the kernel tree?
> > >
> > > nv already is, though I might be a bit behind.
> > >
> > > If there are significant mach64 changes since the last time Dave Airlie
> > > pushed stuff upstream, it's news to me, but I admit to not watching
> > > mach64 development very closely.
> >
> > I should clarify. The DRM is pretty close to current, afaik. Mesa is
> > behindish; not sure what the right thing to do there is.
> >
> > - ajax
> >
>
> Would the latest Mesa/DRM combo will find it's way into F7?
The question is how much breakage people are willing to put up with.
Mesa doesn't release very often, and has a lot of churn. While I
certainly _can_ start doing snapshots...
That said I'm looking at some Mesa stuff this week, so hopefully I'll
get a better idea of how stable head is right now.
- ajax
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]