[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: a question abotu the .spec file
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: a question abotu the .spec file
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:29:43 -0800
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:26:49 -0500, "Chris Taylor" <chtaylo4 gmail com> wrote:
> # now run oldconfig over all the config files
> for i in *.config
> since there are different .config files for each iteration of the kernel (
> i.e kernel-2.6.19-i586.config vs kernel-2.6.18-i586.config) should the
> .spec file be specific to the kernel that it's intended for?
I suspect that you're mistaken in your diagnosis. The scriptlet you
quoted runs in the top of the build tree. A few lines earlier, this
happens:
cp -f %{all_arch_configs} .
The dot was removed, then untarred and patched, at the beginning of build.
Thus, the *.config is not globbed over a bunch of different configs left
over in the unclean .../SOURCES/. It cannot possibly run across different
revisions.
Right? Or I am missing something?
So, if your SKAS patch causes nohint_oldconfig to abort, it's something
other than pollution by old configs. You're still advised to remove
old sources before running rpm -i on an SRPM.
-- Pete
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]