[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Goodbye, Fedora
- From: "Keith G. Robertson-Turner" <fedora-gmane 00003 genesis-x nildram co uk>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Goodbye, Fedora
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:42:05 +0000
Verily I say unto thee, that Arthur Pemberton spake thusly:
> On 2/22/07, Peter Gordon <peter thecodergeek com> wrote:
>> Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
>> >> Fedora, you had every advantage
>> >
>> > Except a financial one, apparently.
>> >
>>
>> I'm somewhat confused by your statement - what lack of financial
>> do you see in Fedora? Red Hat is one of the primary financial sponsors
>> of the Fedora Project; even so far as to have many of its [Fedora's]
>> primary developers on its [Red Hat's] payroll.
>>
>> Please clarify this for me. Thanks.
>
> I could be just in a bad mood, or simply wrong....but I believe he
> meant financial advantage for the OP / complainer.
Correct.
Oh and I'm probably wrong too, and in a bad mood.
--
K.
http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged
.----
| "Future archaeologists will be able to identify a 'Vista Upgrade
| Layer' when they go through our landfill sites" - Sian Berry, the
| Green Party.
`----
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.19-1.2288.fc5
17:39:59 up 3 days, 5:05, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]