Fedora Desktop vs. Fedora Desktop {GNOME, KDE} (was: Re: Fedora 7)

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 05 January 2007 10:01, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Personally, I'd rather see the current FESCo and Core cabal merged into
> a single entity that shares both responsibilities.  The Packaging
> Committee would certainly still exist to come up with the packaging
> guidelines, so that wouldn't change.  And you immediately get community
> involvement in the content of the release isos, which is what I think
> Jessie meant by "hopefully there will be more than just me".  Just my
> $0.02.

Keep in mind that it's just adding more people to a committee who may not care 
about other things such as sponsorship stuff, policy related to packages, 
various other stuff that FESCO current has to vote on.  Its adding more 
people, making quorum harder to reach, especially when they might not have 
any interest/knowledge of whats being voted on.

Personally I don't like a "commitee" for each little task that needs done.  
I'm much more a fan of "hey these are the people doing the work, make sure 
they talk to eachother, and report progress somewhere".  So to that end, I'm 
going to continue doing work, and reporting progress to places like the 
Fedora Board, mailing lists, blogs, whatever.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070105/45347ac7/attachment.sig>