Re: Fedora Desktop vs. Fedora Desktop {GNOME, KDE}

[Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>]

Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 05 January 2007 10:01, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Personally, I'd rather see the current FESCo and Core cabal merged into
>> a single entity that shares both responsibilities.  The Packaging
>> Committee would certainly still exist to come up with the packaging
>> guidelines, so that wouldn't change.  And you immediately get community
>> involvement in the content of the release isos, which is what I think
>> Jessie meant by "hopefully there will be more than just me".  Just my
>> $0.02.
> Keep in mind that it's just adding more people to a committee who may not care 
> about other things such as sponsorship stuff, policy related to packages, 
> various other stuff that FESCO current has to vote on.  Its adding more 
> people, making quorum harder to reach, especially when they might not have 
> any interest/knowledge of whats being voted on.

Yeah, true, that problematic.

> Personally I don't like a "commitee" for each little task that needs done.  
> I'm much more a fan of "hey these are the people doing the work, make sure 
> they talk to eachother, and report progress somewhere". [...]

Yes, in an ideal world that should work. In a small Core-world it seems
to have worked well, too. But I don't think it will work in a big
community project...

Just my 2 cent.

Cu
thl