Fedora Core 7 - Compiz vs Beryl
alan
alan at clueserver.org
Fri Jan 5 18:40:23 UTC 2007
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 22:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
>>> On 1/5/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>
>>>> We *already* have both. Beryl is in Fedora Extras currently. With the
>>>> merge in place, the only argument is what should be the default and here
>>>> is where code quality does matter.
>>>
>>> And fedora packager reponse quality as well !
>>
>> We cant change defaults just because the package maintainers within
>> Fedora dont respond. The solution to that is to post to this list with
>> bug reports to check on progress if there is none for a unreasonable
>> amount of time. This is one of the reasons why I have been advocating
>> weekly irc development meetings. Raise the issue there and solving it
>> should make it more transparent.
>
> Careful. There's lots of bugs that could pop up like that. Without
> some kind of "importance" system, you'll get lots of noise. For
> example, I have a vim bug opened long ago that has just sat there. Is
> it critical? No. Is it damn annoying? Yes.
>
> "Unreasonable amount of time" is subjective.
I have had bugs sit in bugzilla for *years* without any attention. Some
bugs seem to get orphaned or assigned to dead people or something and no
follow-up is ever performed.
Maybe we need a report that shows the open bugs that have been sitting
without update for more than 30/60/90 days.
--
"Invoking the supernatural can explain anything, and hence explains nothing."
- University of Utah bioengineering professor Gregory Clark
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list