On 09.01.2007 02:16, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:55 -0700, Lamont Peterson wrote:On Monday 08 January 2007 04:13am, buildsys redhat com wrote:Updated Packages:[snip]kernel-2.6.19-1.2906.fc7 ------------------------ * Sun Jan 07 2007 Dave Jones <davej redhat com> - 2.6.20rc4So, Dave ... 1. Is this a 2.6.19 or 2.6.20 kernel (or that changelog entry a typo)?2.6.20rc4 He can't increment the version to 2.6.20 until the official release because of RPM NVR rules. E.g. 2.6.20rc4 > 2.6.20
Sure he can -- we even have rules for that; those suggest to call it 2.6.20 even afaics:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22aIf I would review the kernel for the extras merge I'd say "fix this". But I suspect davej won't like to call the kernels 2.6.20 (e.g. 2.6.20-1.2906.rc4.fc7 for example) before they are actually 2.6.20.
This will be one of the problem areas we'll probably have to deal with when it comes to reviewing Core packages for the Extras merge.
CU thl