[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: New VCS Choice; SCM SIG
- From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: New VCS Choice; SCM SIG
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:32:26 +0100 (CET)
Le Mar 23 janvier 2007 14:12, Josh Boyer a écrit :
> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 07:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> > >
>> > cvs doesn't separate the concept of tags and branches.
>> Right, this bloats the repos sizes on the server (svn pushes this bloat
>> to the clients) and renders "branch removal" a pain on the server.
>>
>> > It also works on
>> > individual files rather than whole trees.
>> Right, but I don't see this as a disadvantage. It's a different working
>> principle.
>
> This is actually what I hate most about CVS. It doesn't have the
> concept of changesets. So you can commit a bunch of files at once, that
> logically should be considered as one change and have a single file fail
> to commit because of a conflict while the rest go into the repo.
That's why cvs-import is insanely great
/me runs
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]