New VCS Choice; SCM SIG

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Jan 23 20:31:29 UTC 2007


On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:01 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Kristian Høgsberg <krh at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > However, I don't know of any consensus towards hg.  I know that Jesse wasn't
> > impressed when he did the dist-git prototype, but I think he judged it too
> > quickly.
> 
> Almost NO ONE bothered to actually aid Jesse in his evaluation of the
> various SCM's.  I didn't have a single email from anyone regarding the
> SVN repo I set up for eval.  This decision is getting made by the
> people participating, not by those talking about it.

This needs a tiny bit of clarifying.  We do need to be looking at what
the consumers of the SCM want.  Of course if none of the consumers give
us feedback we can implement whatever we want :-)

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070123/ccafc221/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list