Re: init script bugs and changes

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Patrice Dumas (pertusus free fr) said: 
> Having LSB compliant init scripts seems to me to be a good thing in most 
> cases, even though it should certainly not be mandatory, so why not let
> maintainers act on the bugreports? And keep it open for those who don't
> want to do anything without a policy.

Note that *any* addition of Required-Start, Required-Stop etc. lines to
init scripts is going to change their bootup/shutdown order. Ergo, be
careful.

Bill