[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: init script bugs and changes

From: Jima <jima beer tclug org>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: init script bugs and changes
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:02:16 -0500 (CDT)

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote:

Ville Skyttä (ville skytta iki fi) said:

Is "Default-Start: 2 3 4 5" semantically equivalent
to "chkconfig: 2345 xx yy" ie. it means that the service is enabled by
default?


Yes.

Conversely, what's the proper way to say "not enabled by default?""Default-Start: -"? "Default-Start: "? Leaving Default-Start out? Thedocumentation didn't seem to cover that.


     Jima

Follow-Ups:
- Re: init script bugs and changes
  - From: Ville Skyttä

References:
- init script bugs and changes
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: init script bugs and changes
  - From: Ville Skyttä
- Re: init script bugs and changes
  - From: Bill Nottingham

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]