Fwd: Re: film at 11: kernel update breaks udev.
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Mon Jul 23 14:10:51 UTC 2007
Richard Hughes (hughsient at gmail.com) said:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Argh. So why _are_ we doing our own special rules instead
> > of using the upstream ones ? This isn't the only time I've
> > run into something like this with udev.
>
> Our udev is about 100x times slower than upstream...
I find it hard to believe it's 100x slower. I've done testing
of it with most of the not-needed-for-booting rules commented out -
execution time only dropped from ~5 to ~3.5 seconds.
Bill
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list