Plan for tomorrows (20070726) FESCO meeting

[dragoran]

Hans de Goede wrote:
> I must say I like this approach, it avoids the whole problem of having 
> to rebuild kmods all the time and of wether to delay kernel security 
> updates until all kmods are fixetd etc. I do think however that this 
> might cause some pain for Dave Jones, whose job already is hard. Maybe 
> we should ask him what he thinks about this?
>
well this will cause problems for Dave and Chuck because when one of 
this modules does not build they either have to fix it or just disable it.
1) creates more work for the kernel maintainers
2) does not solve the problem at all