[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPM roadmapping
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RPM roadmapping
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:27:55 -0400
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 17:16 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> 2007/7/27, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai redhat com>:
> > Not everybody is on rpm-maint list and we'd like to hear the wishes of
> > (Fedora) developers/packagers too. So: what have you always wanted to do
> > with rpm, but wasn't able to? Or the other way around: what you always
> > wished rpm would do for you? What always annoyed you out of your mind?
>
> I was wondering if rpm can register aliases when it bundles external
> kernel module (*.ko) like this iwl3945, so it can tell which module
> (external, in it's own rpm / or internally from the kernel) is a
> candidate for some specific hardware...
There's nothing that stops us from adding something to auto-add provides
based on modalias. The "problem" is mostly that it ends up adding a
substantial number of provides which bloats the amount of data that has
to be looked at, downloaded, etc
> Maybe if it can tell more deeply, see that the module is requesting a
> specific firmware as a dependency (and versionned firmwares is what
> should be set as as rule, probably not only for intel firmwares ?!)
> This would be a feature that beginners would appreciate!
And similarly, firmware info can be extracted as long as the modules
export it. The MODULE_FIRMWARE stuff should help there as it gets used
in more modules
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]