[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer jdub homelinux org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:33:19 -0500
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 18:13 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:03 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > If you're referring to migrating Windows users, even they realize there
> > is more than one program to accomplish the same task. Think of AIM,
> > Trillian, ICQ, blah blah blah. Or McAfee vs. Symantec. Or IE vs.
> > Firefox. Hell, even Microsoft doesn't label IE as "Web browser" (which
> > is another bogosity we do but one thing at a time).
>
> How convenient that the desktop team can alternatively be slammed for
> copying Windows or for failing to copy it...
Wait a minute... I'm not slamming anyone. Nor did I alternate here..
(at least I don't think I did).
I'm simply saying that including a program's name in the menu entry
seems common sense to me. What I don't understand is your
classification of "regular user" and why you think having the program's
name in the menu entry is confusing to them.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]