First impressions of a system update with yum

[Benjamin Lewis]

Same here, no problems - this is the first time its worked for me too!

Jon Ciesla wrote:
> My first 32-bit x86 yum upgrade is finished, with no major complications. 
> So far.  I'll let you know. . .
>
>   
>> On 5/31/07, Matthias Saou
>> <thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
>> wrote:
>>     
>>> Other current thought : To hell with it, format "/" and reinstall from
>>> DVD...
>>>       
>> This is my normal course of action. I don't want to deal with the
>> leftover packages and the missing new packages. I just let Anaconda do
>> its job.
>>
>> I have two partitions for root, the current release, and the new or
>> old release. That way my old root with a working system is available
>> if some hardware seems to not work.
>>
>> Also, I don't bother with a DVD or CD, I just use the grub hack.
>>
>> -Schlaegel
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

-- 

Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./                                 PGP Key: 0x647E480C

"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
                                                        -- RFC 1118

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ben.lewis.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070601/9583afda/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 889 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070601/9583afda/attachment.sig>