Re: fedora for ARM

[Andy Green <andy warmcat com>]

Linus Walleij wrote:

> If we have i386, i686 etc, shouldn't it rather be .armv5.rpm, .armv6.rpm
> etc, or actually your current -march flag like in my current
> -march=armv5te?
> 
> .arm.rpm would be OK once the ARM EABI is employed in latter GCC
> versions I guess, or?

No you're right.  It ultimately comes from my cross toolchain having
names like arm-linux-gcc, I am sure any Fedora implementation would make
a smarter choice as you suggest.

-Andy