Re: x86_64 nightmare on F7

[seth vidal <skvidal linux duke edu>]

On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 20:26 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> >  yum is not broken. Broken implies it is eexpected behavior vs what
> > was intended. It is exactly the intended behavior. It may be that the
> > feature of installing compat arch is undesirable in certain situations
> > of fedora use. However it is NOT that it is broken. I'd appreciate it
> > if you'd get that straight.
> 
> As long as it gets fixed I don't mind much whether we call it 'feature'
> or 'bug'.

Fixed implies broken, so you're begging the question. I think a lot of
folks agree about needing to change some default behaviors. How they get
changed I don't know, yet.

-sv