Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Callum Lerwick (seg haxxed com) said:I'm not sure why NM doesn't use it (If could remember correctly, NM used it). NM + dhcdbd + named could be good solution for save bandwidth.dnsmasq is specifically designed for this purpose, and in fact upstream has added dbus support to it specifically so it can integrate nicely with NetworkManager. Why we're not using it, I don't know.NM doesn't actually use caching-nameserver at the moment. Bill
Adam