[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer jdub homelinux org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:11:45 -0500
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:58 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >>>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I was not aware that in writing things down on the wiki was a
> > >>>>> requisite for work to get done...
> > >>>> This is sort of a anticipated response but writing things down on the
> > >>>> wiki *is part* of getting the work done. See
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft
> > >>> Thankfully, that's still a draft, or I'd have to edit the wiki page that
> > >>> I was about to send you a reply... :-)
> > >> It is waiting on FESCo ratification on the meeting tomorrow.
> > >
> > > It doesn't make much sense to ratify such policies without asking for
> > > feedback from the people who are subject to it first, if you ask me.
> >
> > Feedback was asked right in this list. Check the archives.
>
> I see that John asked for feedback 2 days ago, I don't see a single
> reponse to that - do you really think that is sufficient discussion to
> ratify this tomorrow ?!
No.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]