[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: portage vs yum
- From: Kelly <lightsolphoenix gmail com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: Thufir <hawat thufir gmail com>
- Subject: Re: portage vs yum
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:37:20 -0400
On Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:14 am Thufir wrote:
>
> The drawback to fedora is, to my mind, rpm and yum. portage is
> superior. it's also capable, as sabayon has demonstrated, of
> distributing binaries.
Portage, superior? Um, no.
I ran Sabayon once. Couldn't update the base system to the latest versions of
the programs because the system had almost no dependency resolution at all,
and I actually had to manually update each package, one at a time, to get it
to update properly. If I just tried updating like in Fedora, the system
would die after the first three or four packages, reporting a missing
dependency the system seemed incapable of doing itself.
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]