[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: portage vs yum
- From: Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: portage vs yum
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:50:11 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Gordon <peter <at> thecodergeek.com> writes:
> IIRC, whereas Yum and other binary-based systems such as APT track literal
> libraries (e.g., "libfoo.so.42(ABI_TAG)"),
That's how RPM does it (and yum and apt-rpm then compute dependencies based on
that information), yes.
DPKG doesn't support that, so Debian's solution is to just call the package
providing libfoo.so.42 libfoo42, so when libfoo.so.43 comes out, the packages
will require libfoo43 and apt will know that libfoo42 is insufficient.
Kevin Kofler
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]