XULRunner - will be or won't be?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jun 28 10:42:26 UTC 2007
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>
>>> That makes no sense. Are you seriously telling me that you ratify
>>> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed?
>>
>> No but policies can be ratified with the understanding that they are
>> not written in stone.
>>
>>> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack
>>> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything
>>> that gets "voted" on.
>>
>> That's a FESCo decision that I am not involved with.
>
> I wonder if I'm the only person that got the impression you were
> invovled with it based on your comments. Don't try to strongarm people
> into following _draft_ policies based on the fact that you personally
> _expect_ it to be ratified.
I am not personally involved with it. The policy is mostly documenting
the process that we have followed even in the previous release so I do
expect maintainers to take an effort to describe what the plans are.
Rahul
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list