XULRunner - will be or won't be?

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jun 28 10:42:26 UTC 2007


Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>
>>> That makes no sense.  Are you seriously telling me that you ratify 
>>> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed? 
>>
>> No but policies can be ratified with the understanding that they are 
>> not written in stone.
>>
>>> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack 
>>> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything 
>>> that gets "voted" on.
>>
>> That's a FESCo decision that I am not involved with.
> 
> I wonder if I'm the only person that got the impression you were 
> invovled with it based on your comments.  Don't try to strongarm people 
> into following _draft_ policies based on the fact that you personally 
> _expect_ it to be ratified.

I am not personally involved with it. The policy is mostly documenting 
the process that we have followed even in the previous release so I do 
expect maintainers to take an effort to describe what the plans are.

Rahul




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list