XULRunner - will be or won't be?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Fri Jun 29 04:55:07 UTC 2007
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>> This is not a big enough change to warrant that IMO though. It
>>>> won't be any more newsworthy than any other firefox release. It
>>>> will be done sooner rather than later. Probably by next week,
>>>> although having to send my status updates on a tiny project like
>>>> this isn't helping me get it done faster.
>>>
>>> This goes to the heart of the problem. You don't consider the changes
>>> important but it is. Firefox related changes are BIG news.
>>
>> Please stop misinterpreting things. I never said it was not
>> important. I am saying that it is not any more important than going
>> from 2.0.0.0 to 2.0.0.4. It will require an equivalent amount of
>> work: this is essentially just a version upgrade.
>
> This is amply different from being merely a version upgrade. That should
> be evident by the amount of discussions within Fedora and in Mozilla.
>
> People will always find something to complain about
>> but I'm glad that I was at least able to help fulfill your wiki page
>> writing desires.
>
> There will be always people critical of our work but that in many cases
> helps us understand the things we need to change. No thanks to you for
> demotivating sarcasm on efforts that were taken in part from helping you
> avoid answering repetitive questions but let me clarify that I have no
> inherent desires to write wiki pages.
>
>> So fine. You win. Please put up a wiki page that says that XULRunner
>> will be included in the next week or so.
>
> It was never about me winning. It was about having a planned and
> transparent feature list.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/XULRunner
This has been renamed to FeatureXULRunner for consistency.
Rahul
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list