[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: pup: boon or curse? quicker updates or slower updates?
- From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson georgeanelson com>
- To: <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: pup: boon or curse? quicker updates or slower updates?
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:08:19 -0500
At 9:50 PM +0100 3/8/07, nodata wrote:
>Quick question - since you started using pup, do you generally apply
>security updates:
>
>1) Quicker
>2) Slower
>3) About the same.
>
>Perhaps worryingly, I'm noticing that it's 2) Slower, for me.
>Why? Because I wait until a red security update pops up, blues get
>ignored.
I used Pup a couple of times and abandoned it. I kept yum-updatesd and
puplet for several months, but when I noticed that yum-updatesd used 30 MB
of memory ( which I needed) all the time, I shut them down. When I had
them running, I would update whenever puplet popped up. Now I update about
once a day. So, "1) Quicker".
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson georgeanelson com>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]