[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPATH status
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: RPATH status
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:04:18 +0100
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:58:57AM -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >I've noticed that there are still many binaries in /usr/bin that have
> >RPATH hardcoded in them.
>
>
> > 3 /usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2
>
> Some of them are intentional, such as the above. It's either rpath or
> munging LD_LIBRARY_PATH at startup if you want a working firefox.
BTW, the current packaging guidelines don't permit rpath at all and
suggest to put a config in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/, but that doesn't look
right in this case. I guess rpath for plugins/modules should be
allowed.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]