Re: with or without fedora-usermgmt

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Peter Vrabec (pvrabec redhat com) said: 
> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html
> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there
> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt.

My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, and just do static
registrations for everything - it's simpler. It can be combined with
making dynamic system IDs  go from 499 down as well.

Bill