[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: too many deamons by default - F7 test 2 live cd
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph redhat com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: too many deamons by default - F7 test 2 live cd
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:13:19 +0100
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 16:54 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius writes:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 14:26 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Josh Boyer writes:
> > > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:28 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > > > Ralf Corsepius writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > >From my experience (I've used Fedora with both ISDN and with
> > > > > > DSL Lite), Fedora with ISDN or modem is plain unusable, with
> > > > > > "DSL Lite", the situation is "bearable", but isn't fun (an
> > > > > > openoffice update takes a working-day).
> > > > >
> > > > > So don't do that, then. Fedora doesn't require anyone to yum
> > > > > update openoffice.
> > > >
> > > > That isn't a particularly helpful comment.
> > >
> > > Look at it this way: if you really need openoffice updated, then
> > > update it.
> >
> > Well, then you might be able to answer why Core has replaced ca. half of
> > the core distro since FC6's initial roll-out if there weren't sufficient
> > reasons to do so?
>
> Sigh. One of the advantages of Fedora is that we do frequent updates
> so that you can be sure that bugs are fixed in a timely manner. That
> doesn't mean that Fedora is totally useless unless you have every
> single update the instant it is released.
>From a user's perspective things are a bit different:
To be able to follow the benefits of Fedora, you need sufficient
bandwidth. If you can't cope with the bandwidth demands, you're probably
better off using a different distro.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]