[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20070327 changes
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20070327 changes
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:35:49 +0200
On 27.03.2007 12:08, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 06:03 -0400, buildsys redhat com wrote:
>> hal-0.5.9-0.git20070326.fc7
>> ---------------------------
>> * Mon Mar 26 2007 David Zeuthen <davidz redhat com> -
>> 0.5.9-0.git20070326
>> - Update to hal 0.5.9rc2 and hal-info-20070326
> These *need* to be split into separate SRPMS. I don't mind
> co-maintaining these if you want, but if we are updating machine quirks
> once a month or so, [...]
BTW regarding all those machine quirks to make suspend "simply work":
- is there any coordination with the people behind s2ram?
- for the video related quirks: are you differentiating if the systems
where those quirks got tested run
-- vesa framebuffer
-- chip-specific framebuffer driver
-- plain vga (vga=0)
on the console and
-- free X drivers
-- proprietary display drivers
in X? Especially using plain VGA or framebuffer seems to influence the
options that are needed to bring the video device back to work a lot in
my experience.
Side note: Ubuntu and Suse both use framebuffer, Fedora a plain text
console normally; so a quirk that works on Fedora maybe doesn't help on
Suse (or the other way around).
Just wondering. I like the idea to make suspend "simply work" a lot ;-)
CU
thl
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]