Re: Proposal ocaml guidelines

[Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl>]

Gérard Milmeister wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I got looking into this because of these review requests:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815
> >
> > And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml
> > packaging guidelines.
> >
> > Interesting with regards to this are:
> > http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html
> > http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt
>
> Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for
> example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by
> Richard Jones <rjones redhat com>.

Yes an ocaml sig probably is a good idea. But as said I'm only the reviewer 
here, so to those interested, go ahead create a sig. Maybe Nigel Jones will 
want to join you too, as he is the submitter of the package review requests 
linked to above.

Either way we need to put down some guidelines, since the current ocaml 
packages aren't packaged properly (when judging them by the debian / PLD 
guidelines).

Regards,

Hans